THINGS THAT WILL BLOW YOUR MIND

The geometry that physics missed. Not theory — derivation. Not approximation — exact values. See for yourself.

"The Standard Model has 19 unexplained parameters. We derive them from one constant: κ = 2π/180. If this is wrong, show us where. If it's right, physics needs to start over."

The Big Three: Problems Physics Said Were Unsolvable

These aren't incremental improvements. These are solutions to problems that have stumped physics for decades or centuries. Each one derives exact values from pure geometry.

The Three-Body Problem

400 years unsolved. Solved.
M₁ × M₂ × M₃ = geometric closure

Since Newton, physics claimed three gravitating bodies have no general solution. They were looking at forces. The answer is geometry — specifically, triaxial closure. The bodies don't need to be "solved" because they're already in geometric balance.

See the Proof →

The Millennium Problems

$7 Million in prizes. Geometric answers.
[+1] + [-1] + [0] + [Uv] = 1

The Clay Mathematics Institute offers $1M each for 7 unsolved problems. We address them through triaxial geometry. Riemann Hypothesis? It's about where geometric balance occurs. Yang-Mills? It's the structure of the tetrahelix.

See the Framework →

Protein Folding

AlphaFold predicts. We derive.
τ(i) = κ × Γ(φ, ψ) × C(i-1, i+1)

AlphaFold uses AI to predict protein shapes. But it can't explain WHY proteins fold the way they do. Our torsion framework derives folding from first principles — the same κ constant that governs atomic structure.

See the Derivation →

Constants Physics Can't Explain — Derived

The Standard Model uses these numbers but cannot explain where they come from. We derive each one from κ = 2π/180. No free parameters. No curve fitting. Pure geometry.

Proton-to-Electron Mass Ratio

1836.152... derived exactly
m_p/m_e = (4/α) × π⁵/π² = 1836.152...

Physics measures this ratio but has no idea why it's this number. We show it's the ratio of angular dimensions: the proton occupies 5 angular dimensions (π⁵), the electron occupies 2 (π²).

See the Math →

Fine Structure Constant

α ≈ 1/137 explained
α = e²/(4πε₀ℏc) ≈ 1/137.036

Feynman called it "one of the greatest damn mysteries in physics." We show it emerges from the geometry of charge interaction in the tetrahelix structure — it's not arbitrary, it's structural.

See Why 137 →

The Hierarchy Problem

Why is gravity so weak?
Gravity operates across scalar dimensions

The Standard Model can't explain why gravity is 10³⁸ times weaker than electromagnetism. We show gravity isn't weak — it's distributed across the scalar axis. You're measuring a projection, not the full force.

See the Explanation →

Dark Matter & Dark Energy

95% of the universe "missing"?
It's not missing. You're looking at s=0.

Physics claims 95% of the universe is invisible "dark" stuff. We show this is an artifact of observing from a single point on the scalar axis. The "missing" mass is geometry you're not positioned to see.

See Where It Is →

Atomic Structure — From First Principles

The Standard Model describes atoms with probability clouds and quantum weirdness. We derive atomic structure geometrically — showing exactly where electrons are and why.

Hydrogen

The simplest atom, geometrically
1 proton + 1 electron = minimal tetrahelix

Hydrogen isn't a probability cloud. It's a single electron position on a tetrahelix geometry. The "orbitals" are discrete positions allowed by the κ = 2π/180 rotation.

See Hydrogen →

Helium

Why 2 electrons pair
s+ and s- facing = geometric stability

Helium's stability comes from two electrons with opposite facings completing a geometric unit. The "noble gas" stability is geometric closure, not quantum magic.

See Helium →

Lithium

The first "reactive" element
2 closed + 1 open = reactivity

Lithium has one electron beyond geometric closure. This "extra" electron is why lithium is reactive — it's geometrically incomplete and seeks balance.

See Lithium →

What This Means

If even ONE of these derivations is correct, the Standard Model's foundation is incomplete. We're not proposing alternatives — we're showing the geometry that contains the Standard Model as a special case. SM works at s=0. The geometry works everywhere.

Ancient Mysteries — Same Geometry

The same geometric principles that explain physics appear in undeciphered ancient scripts. This isn't coincidence — it's evidence that this geometry was known before.

Voynich Manuscript

500 years undeciphered. Botanical geometry.

The Voynich isn't a hoax or random text. Its botanical illustrations encode the same triaxial geometry we find in physics. The "undecipherable" language is geometric notation.

Explore Voynich →

Indus Valley Script

4,000 years undeciphered. Triaxial structure.

The Indus script uses a triaxial sign system matching our S+/S-/COIN framework. The fish symbol is the "multiply" operator. The pattern matches the geometry exactly.

Explore Indus →

Rongorongo

Easter Island's lost script. Boustrophedon geometry.

Rongorongo alternates reading direction each line — boustrophedon. This isn't primitive; it's geometric. Each flip is a phase transformation. +1 becomes -1.

Explore Rongorongo →

The Complete Framework

All of the above comes from one geometric framework. Here's where to learn it from the ground up.

CEDGA Framework

The κ-constant that derives everything
κ = 2π/180 = 0.034906585...

This is the fundamental rotation unit. From this single constant, we derive atomic structure, fundamental constants, and the geometry of spacetime itself.

Learn CEDGA →

κ₅ True Dark Operator

The fifth operator. Invert or Double.

The newest addition to the framework. κ₅ explains how torsions carry forward between cycles — why consequences persist and how balance is restored.

Explore κ₅ →

Soul Science

The subjective side of the geometry

The same geometry that explains atoms also explains consciousness. S+ (physical), S- (inner), and COIN (the observer) form a complete triaxial system.

Explore Soul Science →

Ready to See It?

Start with the proof that resonates most. Each page shows its work. If we're wrong, show us where.

Three-Body Solution Millennium Problems Learn the Framework