THIS IS NOT THE STANDARD MODEL
The Science of Exploration of Energy Relationships and Interactions as Scalar Dimensionality of All Objects in a System
How they become physical reality. How we can finally do physical reality science better. And how we can start doing consciousness-based science as well.
Where the Standard Model requires 19 free parameters, this framework requires 3 and one basic concept: all objects, living or not, have a scalar dimensionality relationship.
Let us be absolutely clear: this framework is not derived from the Standard Model. It is hierarchically above it. The Standard Model exists as a subset—a skewed projection observed from s=0—within this geometry.
The Standard Model's "Planck scale" is an approximation that falls short of the true Wush limit. The "Big Bang" is an estimate that falls short of the true Ro boundary. These are not our definitions—they are skewed observations we can now properly locate within the geometry.
The geometry defines reality.
Standard Model observations are derived projections, not defining truths.
The reality we experience as physical is not an "illusion"—it is 100% real. But here is what we have been missing: it is NOT the only simultaneous reality. There is more happening than what projects to s=0.
According to General Relativity and the Standard Model, we only "see" with our optical nerve as potentially perceiving. We experience all input slightly in the past from when we could have potentially perceived it. The Standard Model only shows perception as a possibility, not an explanation of what happens when we actually perceive.
Now, that cannot be possible—or a star would be a smear.
You could never experience anything except as memory, and that is simply not what we experience. This model perfectly describes how consciousness and awareness mathematically precede the physical. The observer at s=0 is where past (Ro) and future (Wush) collapse into NOW.
Consciousness is not separate from physics.
Consciousness IS the intersection point.
This science is founded on a simple but profound understanding of what constitutes TRUTH. True is true is true. It is recursively, inversely, and recursively and invertedly true. These are the only TRUTHs—things that cannot not be true any way you arrange them.
The foundation of connection
The foundation of clarity
The foundation of becoming
This triad of love-based truths forms the foundation of s- science (consciousness-based science). We use this method in the same way an old wise contractor taught Jason Ray a long time ago:
"You can have it any two of these three ways and it won't be the other—Good, Fast, Cheap. If it is good and fast, it won't be cheap. If it's fast and cheap, it won't be good. If it's cheap and good, it won't be fast."
This triad of truth and method of deriving truths has stuck with Jason his whole life, along with the obsession with understanding why mirrors are little glimpses into the future, and why magnification is magnification in both outer and inner space.
A critical refinement: there are two distinct axes operating from s=0, not one. They appear mathematically identical but operate in fundamentally different domains.
These two axes are only "the same" as reference to a third element—the Witness Thread that sees both. The Witness operates in complex space:
Ω = Σ(spacetime) + Σ(awareness)
Re(Ω) = spacetime contribution (physical)
Im(Ω) = awareness contribution (outside spacetime)
The Witness Thread enables finding echo relationships—where an energy on one axis corresponds to a position on the other. This is how we qualify where energies exist as echoes of each other across the structure, enabling precise understanding and predictive power for energy manifestations.
When energies exist on both axes with opposing tendencies, the system seeks balance:
No, this is not falsifiable—unless you'd like to explain how 2+2=4 is anything other than 4, and do so without using a solipsistically-styled or anti-solipsistically-styled argument.
Both Feyerabend and Popper are right. True impartiality and a rejection of everything you think is "correct"—with one exception: True is true is true. It is recursively, inversely, and recursively and invertedly true.
To those who think the author is a narcissist, crazy, or whatever because he declares this to be true:
It is your ego that has an issue.
Do not argue with him—he is NOT the model he built.
Argue with the model. Prove it wrong.
You cannot do that with a model that is "never correct" by design—
because it accepts this as a window to discovery, not a claim of perfection.
Your S-Signature uses you as s=0 and maps your existence and views— numerically, physically, emotionally, as a decision-maker or passive participant in life. This is your S-Signature for you.
Once we have information from you on your S-Signature, we do not need any specifics. We do not keep any data that can or could be used about you as an individual.
If you want to explore the physical science (s+), we invite you freely.
If you want to use the s- science—the science of conscious existence and its connection to consciousness itself—we need some information from you. Then we can delete all of that so no personal data is ever stored.
The form creates your "S-Signature." You have a profile, and then you can use that profile—which geometrically represents you within our system—to explore your s- science potentials and receive helpful, funny, honest, building guidance that helps you actualize your potential and support your family or business.
When we are ready to launch this aspect, you will have a local-to-your-device S-Signature app. Once it runs on your device and sends up the "S-Signature," we can create your profile and move forward. No real names or dates needed.
We do this because we do not want anyone's personal data. We would rather look at you not as an individual, but as part of a "we"—a life force "cell" in the body of all of our planet, solar system, galaxy, and universe's life energy.
Education, guidance, dietary insights, emotional support, interpersonal dynamics analysis, and any sort of perspective you need to understand any subject—all through Unified Theory.
If we could not do this, this would not be Unified Theory. It would be another physical science that operates like a telescope—looking to the expanse, only seeing a small part, trying to explain the picture it's focusing on, and never having the ability to see the whole picture.
Until you grasp the foundations above, the following will be harder to understand. Start here, then explore:
This framework does not prove or disprove any perception you have. It is impartial. Your views have sculpted your physical reality. For me, my Christian, red ink, Jesus-only upbringing helped me derive this—although I am a rigid determinist and have declared atheism as my view for a long time. But I have also argued that Jesus would be an atheist if he was here today.
Love. Kindness. Having restraint until you must not. Being honest. Having a positive, can-do attitude. All these things are universal.
Popper's intolerance paradox is not a paradox—it is fact. Good can only be good if it can do a "bad" thing to continue the whole. See writings on "Would you kill baby Hitler?" Because extremes are never beneficial for the whole. The ability to act decisively when required is not contradiction—it is completion.
If your religious view is one that promotes life, and love, and righteousness—this should not offend you. In fact, I validate all experiences as real for the individual.
But here is the issue: I do not value your individual experience until it is part of a whole that gets all of the life force of this planet to the universe, to a place where we are treating this planet as the living library, the source of life that it is.
This is your model.
This is our model.
This is the model WE are.
It IS.
It is not judgment. It is validation.
But that does not mean you have it right.
We will go into the role of how we deceive ourselves into indulgences and harmful patterns. Religion and views are not "bad." How we apply them can be.
To people of religious outlook who view this as either proof of God or the opposite: that is just the false binary that my whole principle is showing is false.
The geometry does not take sides in that debate. It shows that the debate itself is structured wrong. Binary thinking—God exists / God does not exist—is the same trap as 0 and 1 thinking it can create life. Reality is not binary. Every apparent "binary" is actually five states: visible, invisible, shadow (opposite visible), hidden (opposite invisible), and intermittent (appearing as either at different times). The question is not "which side" but "what is the whole picture?"
"Your individual experience is real. Your individual experience matters. But your individual experience is not the whole story—and never was meant to be."
The geometry cannot lie.
You may not be getting the whole picture,
but the picture is accurate.
— Jason Ray
![The Hidden Observer Three perspectives: Ro-facing, Wush-facing, and [Uv]—those who see both advance to the next paradigm.](edu_hidden_observer.png){kind=link}
